Saturday, October 13, 2012

The Premature Demise of Social Security and Medicare


(Sorry, Brad, but last week’s short column was one of a kind)

I recently received a letter from an organization that calls itself the National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare.  If you are in your late 50s or older, maybe you received the same kind of letter.

The content of the letter offended me deeply, and I know this group is trying to scare seniors about their benefits.  To quote the letter:

“The troubling changes to our country’s social safety net appear to be inevitable, especially now, with never-before-seen political will to fundamentally change Social Security and Medicare!”

If the above statement frightens you, then the letter has had its effect, but it is DEAD WRONG in its inference.  The real troubling facts about social Security and Medicare are that both are broken and will soon be bankrupt unless some fundamental changes do take place. 

However, most plans being proposed in Congress for changing Social Security do not affect anyone 55-years-old or older.  They would stay on the current system. And even those who are under 55 would have the choice to stay in the current plan and collect benefits under the same schedule as current recipients.

You may ask, “How can that happen and not still cause the system to run out of funds?”

The answer is that once the plan is unveiled and put into effect, and the new conditions and benefits are explained, very few younger people will choose to remain under the current plan.  The experience of other countries that have reformed their Social Security system proves it hands down.

For one thing, most proposals call for the funds to be allocated to individuals, much like the IRA or 401(k) plans of today. If the individual dies prior to starting benefits, or before collecting the entire fund, his or her beneficiaries would inherit the difference as part of their Social Security fund.

Back in 1935, when FDR first signed Social Security into law, (a step we now learn he actually opposed and was very reluctant to take) there were no retirement plans and certainly no accounts for people to save tax deferred retirement funds.  The Social Security system was, for most people, the only retirement plan available. 

Over the years since 1935, there have been many retirement plans implemented, and the most important ones are those that enable the individual to save independently of others and keep the funds as part of his or her estate. Anyone who fails to take advantage of this benefit is—sorry, but it is true—a fool! That is especially true when your employer has a matching contribution, which many company plans do provide.

People under the age of 55 have no excuse for not saving for retirement anymore, so Social Security should be only one part of the overall retirement benefit.  No younger person should depend on it as the major portion of retirement income, much less the only benefit.

How do we know that the proposed plans for reforming Social Security will work?  We have a model to look at to see how a similar plan is working out.

The South American County of Chile put a very close proximity of the proposed plan into effect in 1981, so they have over thirty years of experience to relate how well the system works.  I won’t go into the Chilean Social Security plan here, but I invite you to read about it at Chile’s Social Security Model.  I will admit that there are pros and cons on the topic, but the pros far outweigh the cons.

Now, as to the other half of the equation, Medicare, I won’t even try to discuss that, other than to state that I don’t believe the Affordable Healthcare Act (a.k.a. Obamacare) is the answer.  My main problem with Obamacare is that it takes away over $700 billion from Medicare in order to implement the program.  That cannot be good for seniors in any scenario.  I’ll leave it up to you to research the different proposals to reform our health care system, but suffice it to say that some reform of Medicare is absolutely necessary in the next 10-20 years to keep it solvent.

I hope you will share this column with anyone you know who is age 55 and older. They don’t deserve to be scared that their benefits are going to be reduced or taken away under any plan currently being proposed in Congress or in the current presidential campaign.  It just isn’t so!